August 12, 2007

It’s Amazing

It never ceases to amaze me how any doctor is able to accurately diagnose patients. With as little information as they are able to get from the patient, it’s kind of a miracle that things turn out right…What am I talking about?

Well, I have a friend who was recently hospitalized (in ICU even) for a urinary tract infection that had spread through his body. Fortunately he got better but in the last month and a half has proceeded to tell me (of course, "as a friend - who just happens to be a doctor" - yeah right) bits and pieces of information about his past and even his current condition (he had to self-catheterize himself - putting a tube in his own bladder four times a day to get the urine out and he got another infection) than i’m sure any of his doctors know. And I’ve listened to him a heck of a lot longer than the 15 minutes your doctor might have with you. The things he tells me he didn’t think were IMPORTANT to tell the doctor - or they were things that he thought of when talking to an old friend. In fact, he must have talked to everyone about it and told everyone his symptoms EXCEPT his doctor. Then he wanted to know how I could have told him some of the stuff I have when I’m a thousand miles away and his local doctors aren’t able to tell him these things….just amazing…

But each time I get off the phone with him I realize that this is what real life is all about and that’s why it’s so important for each of you to keep a diary of your past medical history, your past procedures, your medicines and as importantly, your current symptoms. Then make sure you take that diary with you. You should even transcribe your symptoms onto another piece of paper to give the doctor. Summarize things - "I’ve had abdominal pain above my belly button and under my right rib cage for about 3 weeks now. It seems to come and go and it’s so very sharp that it doubles me over and I have to continually walk around until it goes away. I throw up several times while I have the pain. It even goes to my back and my right shoulder sometimes. Nothing makes it better - it just goes away by itself. It usually comes on about 4 hours after dinner though, especially when we’ve had greasy stuff. etc."

If you take that summary out of your diary, put it on a sheet of paper and give it to the doctor, he can extract so much information from it and can then ask more pertinent questions - rather than having to start from scratch and be like a dentist - pulling teeth!

Be thankful that your diagnoses are correct as many times as they are..and help your doctor along the next time.

Terrie

Permalink • Print • Comment

August 9, 2007

It’s All a Matter of Perception

What on earth do I mean by that? What is perception? All I know is that perception is reality. How many times have we heard that? And how often do we think of that when we’re in the medical environment? Probably not as often as we should…..

I was having lunch with a good friend and his wife (whom I’ve gotten to know fairly well in the past 2 years). She told me about her encounter with a new doctor recently for a sinus infection. She was adamant when she simply stated "I know enough about what’s going on in my body that by the time I go to the doctor, I just want them to give me the drugs I need." My internal reaction to that was very disconcerting. I understood what she was saying but my doctor-instinct was horrified - I know I’m telling alot about myself :-)

I wanted to explain to her that sometimes she might not know exactly what was wrong with her because "after all, you’re not medical" but i restrained my tongue for once, knowing that what she believed was, in fact, reality to her - and therefore, she probably did know what she needed.

I recalled a very sad case where a mother did not want to take her twin daughters home from the ER because they did not seem "better" to her after their asthma treatment. The ER doctor (not me, thank goodness) told her that the girls were not wheezing so they "must" be better. So, reluctantly mom took them home. The outcome was not good - one of the girls ended up dying. I tell this not to be morbid but to emphasize to patients that they really do know their bodies better than anyone (and to remind the physicians to listen to the patients and pay attention). I learned such a valuable lesson that night, nearly 28 years ago - and I think that’s what held my tongue in abeyance with my friend’s wife.

The point is that doctors and patients have different perspectives and therefore the perception of each is most likely 180 degrees apart. Each of us has to ask for clarification or offer it if we want to be understood by the other - and if we’re not understood, we’re in deep trouble.

Doctors - throw away your judgments and open up your ears AND your minds.

Patients - stick up for yourself and make sure your doctor hears you and where you’re coming from. And then make sure you understand what he’s saying.

Perception really is reality

Til next time…..

Terrie

Permalink • Print • Comment

June 29, 2007

Make The Most of Your 15 Minutes

This is cool. My article got published on MySeniors.com . It was also in HealthNewsDigest.com

Your Doctor Said What?

Make the Most of Your 15 Minutes

By: Dr. Terrie Wurzbacher DO 

Doctor-Patient Communication What your doctor does (and doesn’t) need to know

     Ok, you’ve got your appointment scheduled. You’ve kept your symptom diary. Now what? What is it your doctor needs to know – and conversely, what is it he doesn’t need to know? After all, you’ve only got those infamous 10 minutes to get everything accomplished – tell your problem, be examined, get a diagnosis, and ask your questions.

    What does the doctor need to know? Just about everything – but not in the conversational manner you’re used to. What’s your predominant problem and how long have you been experiencing it. Have you had this before – sometime in the past perhaps? If so, what was your diagnosis (if you went to have it checked)?    

    In addition, you should list the associated problems – pain, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, urinary symptoms, loss of appetite, cough, fever, chills, headaches, etc. It’s important to make sure you separate the two issues.

    What’s the character of the symptoms? Are they intermittent? Or constant? Are there periods of time when you don’t have any symptoms and feel pretty good?

    Have there been any changes in severity or location? Changes can indicate a lot about what’s going on.

    Why did you decide to come see the doctor now? Was it that it became intolerable? Was it that you finally realized it wasn’t going to go away?

    Remind the doctor about your past medical problems and your current ones. Take your index card and read off of it to him. Often times, your current symptoms may be related to your other problems or to their treatment.

    Likewise use your other index card – the one with your medicines listed on it.

    Tell him if you’ve had any other problems that you’ve seen another doctor for. Have your medicines changed? Have you run out of your medications? If so, when? If you’ve stopped your meds because of your symptoms, tell him when you stopped them.

    Have you been taking any herbal medications or other naturopathic remedies?

    What’s changed in your daily living or activities or abilities? Do you get out of breath faster, are you unable to walk up your stairs or go for your usual walk since you got sick?

    What doesn’t your doctor need to know? He doesn’t need to know all the details that go along with you telling your story. This is not a good way to describe your problems “I felt worse than when cousin Charles died” or “It started 3 weeks ago on a Friday and then that whole weekend we were at a high school reunion – you know my 30th – it wasn’t bothering me as much except when I went to bed. The long car ride made me more carsick than usual though. When we went to dinner with the Sullivans I wasn’t able to eat as much but I really didn’t have any bowel problems.”

    Eliminate the natural conversational patterns to get more out of the time you have with the doctor. Short and to the point makes it easier for him to hear the pertinent points.

    The doctor doesn’t need to know what you think the diagnosis is – unless you’ve had this same condition/symptoms diagnosed by a physician before. If you try to convince the doctor it’s something, then you may mislead him or lead him down the wrong path.

    Give your doctor your story in bullet points and don’t elaborate unless asked. Practice and write things down and you’ll do great!

Permalink • Print • Comment

December 3, 2006

Where’ve I been, you ask?

Well, even if you don’t ask, I’m gonna tell you!

I’ve been sick - imagine that, a doctor, sick. But it’s been a very positive experience for me and will be the source of serveral blog entries.

I had a respiratory infection with first some days of just feeling cruddy (that’s not the word I actually used but it would have been censored). Then I had to fly to Washington, DC for a business meeting. By the time I got to DC, my throat was totally RAW and worse than I ever remember it being. But, here’s a good plug - the Hall’s MAX sort throat lozenges are phenomenal but I don’t think there are any more since I probably bought them all that week.

The morning after I arrived in DC, my throat was horrible but the bad part was that i couldnt breath while walking. This just got worse and worse so that any type of exertion had me really breathing hard.

By the time I flew home on Thursday I was too scared that this might be my heart to even take my migraine medication - and that’s being pretty darned scared. I arrived back in San Antonio at about noon, called and made an appointment and drove to the hospital and got admitted about 10 hours later. They ruled out a heart attack and a blood clot (pulmonary embolus) but weren’t sure what was really going on.

But that’s not important, I’m much better now. But as I was sick and really unable to do much for the last few weeks, including talk (thus no audio blogs for a while), I had much time to reflect on my life. I came up with the appropriate diagnosis and it began with an "S" - no, not that "S" word.

STRESS

As I looked back over the past year, it’s been a whirlwind and great year but it’s also been crammed full of stress. Stress that I have either created or allowed to build. We don’t have enough electrons to go into that but if you’d like a sleep aid, email me and I’ll tell you all about it - just kidding.

Seriously though, I understood it before but I firmly believe now that we  have to address stress in our life - or better yet, how to eliminate it. And a few good friends have given me advice - don’t let things I have no control over bother me. and even though that’s not easy, it’s certainly something we all should strive for. And the other is to ask ourselves "how can I have the most fun at this precise moment?" I think that’s the best of all and intend to try to work with that as much as possible. I can think of scenes for a sitcom perhaps or stories for a stand up comedian. Anything that will make things fun.

I had to turn my life around and know that there’s a bunch of stuff going on but it’s not stressful UNLESS I MAKE IT STRESSFUL.

Please take heed of this. Stress adversely impacts our immune system and without our immune system, we’re in big trouble.

There are some other "alternative" medicine things I’ve been exposed to also in the past few weeks that I may eventually share depending on my results. But combatting stress in whatever way you can is essential.

So, bottom line is that I’m back now and I’ll be posting away again. It’s good to be back and I appreciate all my readers!

Terrie

Permalink • Print • 1 Comment

July 14, 2007

Do You Take Your Medicines As Prescribed?

 Another clip from Medical News Today about the number of pills and Daily Adherence to medication. Although it focuses on certain conditions, the issue is applicable to everyone and every condition. Compliance (adherence to instructions) is such a big factor in health success that we all (doctors and patients alike) must pay attention to what will improve a person’s ability to follow the advice/instructions:

New Study Suggests Number Of Pills Not A Factor When It Comes To Daily Adherence To Medication

There is no correlation between the daily number of pills a patient is prescribed to take and how well a patient will adhere to a dosing regimen, suggests a new study presented recently at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) held in San Diego (April 11-14). The large-scale study looked at patients taking a variety of high blood pressure medicines, specifically calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and provides more supportive evidence that adherence to prescribed medication is influenced by a multitude of factors. The study specifically examined dosing regimen to see if there was a relationship between that factor and adherence in patients with a co-payment of at least $20.

More on Do You Take Your Medicines As Prescribed?

Permalink • Print • Comment

August 15, 2007

Make the Most of Your 15 Minutes

 

Make the most of your 15 minutes: how to make every second of you doctor’s visit count

So you only have 15 minutes with your doctor. Learn to make the most of every second. Try these techniques and see how much time you save - save for clarification and questions.

If you’ve kept up with your "index card system" you’re one step ahead of the game. You can read from the cards or give them to the doctor - the cards have your list of medical problems and your medications.

Keep the symptom diary and write out the list of symptoms, time of onset and any changes since they began. Practice talking about your symptoms ahead of time. Solicit the help of a spouse or friend to listen to you. Have that person practice looking away from you and looking at you so you experience both methods of exposure and you can get more comfortable talking about embarrassing symptoms to another person.

Remember to just list them with minimal conversational tone. That saves a ton of time.

Bring paper and a pencil so that you can take notes as the doctor asks you questions or says things you’re not sure of. Tell the doctor early on that you may need to interrupt to adequately understand what he’s asking of you or what he’s telling you. If you say this and ask "permission", you’ll get off on the right foot. But keep your notes anyway. While you’re waiting for the doctor, jot things down that you think of as you’re sitting there. After the doctor’s been in there, write down questions. Ask the nurses if you have the opportunity when they come in. Ask the nurses how to approach the doctor with questions if they can’t answer them.

Consider bringing a tape recorder- ask the doctor if you can record the encounter so that you don’t have to worry about misinterpreting what he said. Explain that you want your spouse to know what went on and "what the doctor said". You can even make a joke of it with him because I’m sure he’s heard many times before that the patient has problems remembering enough to satisfy the spouse.

Write, write, write. If you have chronic problems, you should get a stenographer’s pad and label that as your doctor pad. Use it to record your symptoms and take it with you to put your notes in. This way it’s always available for reference and you don’t have to worry about small pieces of paper and worrying about losing them.

Stop worrying about whether you’re saying the right thing or not or whether you’re answering questions correctly. Just say what comes to mind. There is no answer the doctor is looking for - he wants to hear what’s going on with you.

Don’t worry about whether the doctor looks at your or seems friendly. This will distract you from the purposes of your visit - to relay your symptoms accurately and succinctly and to receive information back. That should be your only focus.

Focusing on these two purposes will help you make the most of your time - those precious 15 minutes will seem a lot longer.

Hope this helps!

 

Permalink • Print • Comment

July 5, 2007

Armed by the Internet….

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Judy Feder is grateful for having what she calls a rare rapport with her oncologist: the ability to discuss material she finds on the Internet that could alter her treatment course and quality of life.

Feder, 50, a public-relations professional in White Plains, N.Y., was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2001. She began approaching her doctor with articles, studies and ideas shortly thereafter.

Recently, she found a small body of evidence saying that one of her chemotherapy drugs, Xeloda, would be as effective if used for seven days followed by seven days off, as opposed to a 14-day stretch that precedes a break. The difference would spare her some noxious side effects, she said.

Her doctor was receptive. "She was going to go that route anyway but she said ‘I’m really glad you brought this in because I don’t have time to read everything,’" Feder said. Though her oncologist doesn’t agree with all her inquiries, Feder’s input — bolstered by online patient support groups — helps her take charge of her own care.  

"A couple of years of ago there was this default that doctors would say, ‘Oh, there’s so much bad information out there on the big nasty Internet.’ But I think people have gotten a lot more sophisticated" about finding reliable, credible resources, she said. "I don’t think doctors can use that excuse anymore, that if you got it on the Internet it’s not valid."

Feder’s experience underscores how the doctor-patient relationship is changing from one that pits a passive patient against a paternalistic doctor to more of an active collaboration. Some of the shift is driven by financial need. With more cost-sharing and high-deductible health plans emerging in employers’ benefits mix, patients are under pressure to take more responsibility for their care and its costs. 

"Consumers are forced to be more empowered, whether it’s higher copays for physicians or having to make decisions about things," said Mark Bard, president of Manhattan Research, a health-care market research firm in New York. "They need access to information on the front line, and increasingly physicians are being shown that information." 

Nearly two-thirds of physicians say the trend of patients coming in armed with online information is positive, up from 62% in 2004, according to a recent study from Manhattan Research. The referrals increasingly work both ways. Slightly more than half, or 52%, of 1,300 U.S. doctors said they recommend health-related Web sites to their patients.

Watching for pitfalls
Still, not all doctors welcome patients’ initiative and may see it as threatening to their expertise. Specialists such as neurologists, surgeons and cardiologists tend to be less enthusiastic than primary-care doctors and oncologists, Bard said.
What’s more, some doctors worry that consumers will try to self-diagnose and may be led astray by a false sense of security or unwarranted anxiety.
"There are cases where it can be detrimental and confusing to both patients and physicians," said Dr. Rick Kellerman, a family doctor in Wichita, Kan., and president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, whose members often point patients to its Web site, www.familydoctor.org.
Online research tends to benefit patients with certain conditions such as earaches, sore throats or even high blood pressure, he said. "We want patients in those situations to be well-educated."
But where the Web falls short is when a patient has a vague symptom or undifferentiated problem that could be caused by any number of ailments, Kellerman said, citing fatigue as an example. "Tiredness could be from thyroid problems, anemia, viruses like mononucleosis, diabetes. It could be a sleep disorder; it could be from depression."
Once patients jump to a conclusion, doctors can have a hard time steering the conversation back to a productive inquiry, he said. "It sometimes takes a long time to get people back on track."
While some patients will arrive with stacks of print-outs they want to discuss, most make judicious use of credible Internet material, which typically makes office visits run smoother, not longer, Bard said. "For more physicians than not, it’s adding some level of efficiency to their practice and generally improving physician-patient communication."
Doctors need to help patients determine what information is relevant to their individual situation and point out material that may be tainted by conflicts of interest, said Dr. Vicki Rackner, a surgeon and president of Medical Bridges, a Seattle outfit that consults with employers on employee health-care matters.
"There’s an awful lot of information that’s there to sell a product and sometimes it’s really hard to tell whose purposes are being served by having that information on the Internet," she said.
The first step is for patients to understand how much information they feel comfortable having and whether their style is compatible with their doctor’s, Rackner said. "If they are the kind of person who feels more empowered if they’ve done more research and they bring in a file case and the doctor says, ‘Oh, when did you go to medical school?’ 

That’s not a good match."

Where it gets less clear-cut is when patients can’t find answers from the medical establishment, she said. "There are people who go round and round and round and truly elude diagnosis or come to a conclusion that some doctors don’t believe in, like chronic fatigue syndrome."
Conditions that tend to strike women in particular can cause mysterious symptoms that leave patients in limbo for years before they get a solid diagnosis.
"The classic is lupus," Rackner said. "So what do you do? Do you suffer in silence, go to see another doctor? Most people go on the Internet, and the Internet is not set up as a diagnostic tool so they get frustrated. I have a lot of empathy for them, but what they need is a good doctor."
Spurring behavior change
Health information has been one of the Web’s most popular attractions for some time, and the offerings keep growing. Many existing sites are enhancing their tools and forming partnerships to better serve users and fend off competition from high-profile entrants such as Steve Case’s recently launched Revolution.com. See previous Vital Signs.
In the first three months of 2007, 55.3 million U.S. Internet users visited health-related sites, a 12% increase from the same period last year, according to comScore. WebMD Health led the category, followed by the National Institutes of Health site, NIH.gov, MSN Health and Yahoo Health.
Patients increasingly are going online not only to research information about their symptoms and conditions but to check a doctor’s ratings on sites such as HealthGrades.com, Best Doctors and Checkbook.org.
Physicians are starting to take ratings more seriously to improve their own practices, said Dr. Atul Gawande, a Harvard cancer surgeon and author of "Better: A Surgeon’s Notes on Performance."

"If we’re more transparent about our results, that gives people better opportunities to go to places where they know they get better results, but it also puts pressure on us to think harder about how we get those better results," Gawande said.

Doctors’ groups such as the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Heart Association and the American Society of Clinical Oncology provide patient-friendly Web sites that answer common questions, connect patients to other resources and remind them what to ask their doctors.
With the help of the Internet, patients are more aware of the portfolio of treatments for heart disease, said Dr. Clyde Yancy, medical director of the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute in Dallas.
Patients often resist making lifestyle changes and lowering their risks, he said, but those who use Web sites such as the American Heart Association’s Heart Profiler increase the chances they will comply with treatments.
"The next time you interface with that patient, they may have an understanding and may even have a sense of urgency," Yancy said. "That’s a wonderful day in the office because you can really make some headway."
Diane Blum, editor in chief of the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s Web site called People Living with Cancer, said reputable sites that suggest questions to ask the doctor or help patients locate clinical trials perform a vital service.
PLWC.org now details 100 cancer diagnoses, up from 25 when it launched five years ago. It has expanded offerings on coping with cancer and survivorship as more people are able to treat it as a chronic condition.
As more people go online for health information, the shift in expectations between doctors and patients is likely to be permanent, Blum said.

"Doctors are getting used to and valuing the more participatory and educated patient," she said. "With the baby boomer generation aging and moving into the prime years of cancer diagnosis, you’re going to see more of this interaction." 

Kristen Gerencher is a reporter for MarketWatch in San Francisco.

Permalink • Print • Comment

June 25, 2007

Preventing Medication Errors

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) published findings in 1999 on the quality of healthcare in America. That report, "To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System," concluded that as many as 7000 Americans die from medication errors each year.[1] In July 2006, the IOM released a new report, "Preventing Medication Errors," stating that the frequency of medication errors and related injuries was still a serious concern.[2]

A common question that arises is: "What drugs are most often involved in medication errors?" Matthew Grissinger, RPh, FASCP, is a medication safety analyst with ISMP, the nation’s oldest voluntary drug error reporting program, located in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania. His session on "The Top 10 Adverse Drug Reactions and Medication Errors" drew an audience that filled the meeting hall.[3]

Grissinger first referred to a study that identified the 10 drugs most commonly implicated in adverse events requiring treatment in a hospital emergency department (ED).[4] The study also documented the frequency with which each of the 10 drugs was involved:

  1. Insulin (8%);
  2. Anticoagulants (6.2%);
  3. Amoxicillin (s) (4.3%);
  4. Aspirin (2.5%);
  5. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2.2%);
  6. Hydrocodone/acetaminophen (2.2%);
  7. Ibuprofen (2.1%);
  8. Acetaminophen (1.8%);
  9. Cephalexin (1.6%); and
  10. Penicillin (1.3%).

Unintentional overdoses made up 40% of these ED visits, representing the most prevalent mechanism of injury by far. Other mechanisms included side effects and allergic reactions. Some of the drugs on this list are especially common (eg, hydrocodone and amoxicillin), so the sheer volume of prescriptions written is a major factor.

The elderly also play a key role in this issue, as they account for 34% of all written prescriptions. The average number of prescriptions for an elderly person in the United States in 2000 was 28.5 per year. That number is estimated to reach 38.5 by the year 2010. Almost a quarter million seniors are hospitalized every year due to reactions between prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) medications.

Common misuses that lead to adverse drug events are taking incorrect doses, taking doses at the wrong times, forgetting to take doses, or stopping the medication too soon (all nonadherence issues). An example of commonly misused medications can be seen with arthritis therapies. Seventy million Americans suffer from arthritis and joint pain, which translates into 30 million people taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, either prescription or OTC. Misuse of these drugs leads to 103,000 hospitalizations and 16,000 deaths per year. Unnecessary use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs also increases avoidable side effects, such as dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Another high-volume prescription class is the antibiotics. This group represents significant inappropriate prescribing: Twenty-three million antibiotic prescriptions are written for colds, bronchitis, and upper respiratory infections each year, Grissinger said, despite the fact that antibiotics don’t kill viruses.

Top 10 Medications Involved in Drug Errors

A somewhat different top 10 list identifies medications that are most commonly misused or mishandled in some way by healthcare professionals. This list is based on information from the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP), which maintains a database of medication errors that are reported anonymously. The figures represent drug errors associated with acute hospital care[5]:

  1. Insulin (4% of all medication errors in 2005);
  2. Morphine (2.3%);
  3. Potassium chloride (2.2%);
  4. Albuterol (1.8%);
  5. Heparin (1.7%);
  6. Vancomycin (1.6%);
  7. Cefazolin (1.6%);
  8. Acetaminophen (1.6%);
  9. Warfarin (1.4%); and
  10. Furosemide (1.4%).

Hospitals and healthcare systems use the USP database to track medication errors and identify trends. Drug errors are defined as unintentional acts committed by healthcare providers involving medications. Grissinger noted that comparable data are unavailable for outpatient care.

The number 1 error-prone medication is insulin. In fact, a 1998 ISMP study found that 11% of all serious medication errors involve insulin misadministration.[6] Errors include mixing up products with similar packaging (look-alike products); confusing generic listings on computer databases; similarity in names (eg, Humalog and Humulin); and most importantly, confusing the abbreviation "u" for units with the number 0. ISMP reports that these errors have been occurring for over 30 years.

The second drug on this list is morphine, which can be extrapolated to include all opioids, Grissinger said. Similar names for some of these drugs often cause confusion, such as:

  • Avinza and Evista;
  • Morphine and hydromorphone;
  • Oxycontin and MS Contin;
  • Hydrocodone and oxycodone; and
  • Oxycodone and codeine.

In the community pharmacy, these drugs often are stacked close together in a locked area, and many have similar packaging, making it easy to grab the wrong one when dispensing. Another common mistake is mixing up oxycodone with oxycodone ER (extended release), especially in handheld device order entry.

Morphine oral solutions cause many problems because of the multiple concentrations that are available, all stored close to each other. For example, it would be easy to confuse "mL" with "mg"; using 5 mL of morphine 20 mg/mL (100 mg) instead of the prescribed 5 mg (0.25 mL) would lead to overdosing the patient. Alternatively, an intended dose of 1 mL of morphine 20 mg/mL (20 mg) might be given as 1 mL of 10 mg/5 mL (2 mg), thus underdosing the patient. Grissinger also reported a case in which Avinza (morphine ER caps) 30 mg was misinterpreted and dispensed as "qid" (4 times daily) instead of "qd" (once daily), causing a near-fatal overdose.

Acetaminophen is another drug on the error list that causes many problems. It is available in many different strengths, and various measuring devices are available for dispensing it. In addition, it is found in many combination medications, both prescription and OTC. Prescription labels of combination products with acetaminophen can be very confusing for the patient. For example, hydrocodone 10/650 has 650 mg of acetaminophen, but many patients would not know how to interpret that.

Grissinger reminded the audience that acetaminophen can be toxic, even though it is sold OTC. A recent study showed that acetaminophen-induced liver toxicity accounts for more than 40% of US cases of acute liver failure.[7]

Antibiotics are the next big group of drugs associated with medication errors. As with opioids, the liquid dose concentrations increase the risk for mistakes. Confusion over measurements in "mL" vs "tsp" (teaspoons) can cause a 5-fold overdose or underdose if undetected. In one case, for example, azithromycin suspension was dispensed with directions to take 2.5 tsp daily (equivalent to 12.5 mL) instead of the intended 2.5 mL daily, Grissinger reported. The entire contents of the bottle were administered according to the labeled instructions, and the child developed diarrhea.

Reconstituting antibiotics can also be problematic. Pharmacists have mistakenly reconstituted antibiotic suspensions with alcohol instead of distilled water.

System Errors May Interfere With Individual Efforts

Most healthcare professionals have learned the "5 rights" of safe medication use: the right patient, the right drug, the right time, the right dose, and the right route of administration.

However, in his book Medication Errors, Michael Cohen wrote that these "rights" focus on individual performance and can overlook system errors. Examples of system errors are poor lighting, inadequate staffing, handwritten orders, doses with trailing zeros, and ambiguous drug labels. All of these can prevent healthcare professionals from verifying the 5 rights.[8]

Experts at ISMP have identified 10 key "system" elements that most influence medication use, reported Donna Horn, RPh, DPh, ISMP Director, Patient Safety - Community Pharmacy. Systems factors play a major role in increasing the likelihood that an individual will make an error. Deficiencies in any of these system elements can lead to medication errors[9]:

  1. Patient information (age, weight, allergies, diagnoses, and pregnancy status);
  2. Drug information (up-to-date information readily available);
  3. Communication (collaborative teamwork between all healthcare members and the patient);
  4. Drug labeling, packaging, and nomenclature (limit look-alike and sound-alike drug names, confusing packaging);
  5. Drug standardization, storage, and distribution (restricting access to high-alert drugs);
  6. Medication delivery device acquisition, use, and monitoring;
  7. Environmental factors (poor lighting, cluttered work spaces, noise, interruptions, nonstop activity, and deficient staffing);
  8. Staff competency and education;
  9. Patient education; and
  10. Quality processes and risk management (systems are needed for identifying, reporting, analyzing, and reducing the risk for medication errors with a nonpunitive culture of safety).

When an error occurs, it is tempting to blame individuals, Horn said. A "systems approach," however, looks at the whole system rather than individual errors. For instance, failures in the design or implementation of systems can lead to excessive reliance on memory, lack of standardization, inadequate access to information, and poor work schedules. Thus, with a systems approach, accountability is expanded to include anyone who had any influence over the error, setting the stage for broader solutions.

How Can We Prevent Medication Errors?

Nearly half of all adverse drug events have some form of "preventability," and many do not represent errors of commission but, rather, errors of omission. This implies a failure on the part of someone (pharmacist, physician, patient, or the interactions between these groups) to detect certain factors that most likely led to the adverse event. These factors include:

  1. Failure to detect a disease state contraindication to the drug therapy;
  2. Failure to detect a significant drug interaction;
  3. Failure to detect a significant drug allergy;
  4. Failure to prescribe the correct dose for a specific patient;
  5. Failure to monitor drugs with narrow therapeutic indexes; and
  6. Patient knowledge deficits.

Many of these can be avoided by spending a few minutes counseling the prescriber and/or the patient. Communication is key, Horn said. Barriers to effective communication include illegible handwriting, abbreviations, verbal orders, ambiguous orders, and fax or ePrescribing problems.

When communicating with prescribers, pharmacists should identify the issues clearly and concisely, said Marialice Bennett, RPh, FAPhA, Professor and Pharmacy Director of the University Health Connection at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio.[10] She offered these suggestions for such discussions:

  • Outline the specifics of the problem;
  • Keep focused on the patient;
  • Provide possible solutions;
  • Ask for prescriber feedback; and
  • Document the final decision.

Conflict can lead to poor communication, which can hinder the discovery of medication errors, she said. Conflicting opinions about patient care should be handled objectively and professionally. The ISMP recommends that healthcare organizations create a code of conduct that encourages behaviors supportive of team cohesion, staff morale, and sense of self-worth and safety.

Permalink • Print • Comment

October 22, 2006

It’s all about tone of voice…audioblog

Has anyone in your family (like maybe your mom) ever said "hey, watch your tone of voice"?

And maybe you have no idea of what you did or said wrong but your mom "heard" something negative in your voice.

Think of the modern day "whatever". I’m really getting so I hate this word - and as a result of disliking it so much, I’ve been practicing different ways to say it so that it’s NOT so passive aggressive.

In the doctor’s office you’re probably not happy, you’re cold, sick (or you most likely wouldn’t be there), tired, feeling vulnerable with your butt hanging out, etc etc…so, you’re ready for a fight and you’re ready to hear things the "wrong" way perhaps.

And the doctor maybe hasn’t been having the best of days either  (or perhaps is just trying to act and sound professional). So, the doc comes in, says "hi" but looks distracted and you’re automatically on the defensive.

If he (or she) then says "what’s going on with you", depending on how warm sounding the tone is, you might respond in different ways. But guess what, your response then leads to a similar response from the doctor etc etc etc…

Someone has to break the chain.

Listen in on my discussion of this topic:

Terrie

Permalink • Print • Comment

October 20, 2006

Inside a doctor’s mind

I think back to some of my encounters with patients and feel lousy that I probably acted as if I were not really "there" with the patient. Even though as an ER doctor I learned to multi-task very early on, the patient never knew that I really could pay strict attention to them and what they were saying while still hearing and seeing everything that was going  on around me in the ER.

I imagine they thought I wasn't interested in them and therefore didn't think their problem was very important.  And that's not the case at all.

So, I caution people to not make snap judgments about whether your doctor is listening to you or not. You cannot really tell just based on how they do or don't look at you. On a personal note, I have to tell people I'm talking with (including my best friends) that if I'm looking away, I'm probably trying to concentrate/think and listen to a greater degree. I find that when I look at you and try to pay attention to you, I get distracted - usually by your eyes for they ARE the window to your soul and you can learn so much from someone's eyes. But, if I don't tell the other person this, they might think that my looking away is a sign of boredom. And it's just the opposite. A fine line to walk.

Use all your senses to accumulate an entire picture about what's happening with the doctor before you judge that he or she is not "interested" in you or your problem.

Terrie

Permalink • Print • Comment
Made with WordPress and a search engine optimized WordPress theme • Boxed skin by Denis de Bernardy