May 11, 2007

Expectations, Judge Your Doctor’s Communication Skills & Perceptions…

We discussed all that tonight on BlogTalkRadio Show - Your Doctor Said What!

It’s important that your expectations be realistic. Patients tend to diagnose themselves by talking to their friends, neighbors, co-workers (or going online) and that is not a great thing to do.

Patients judge a doctor’s  office based on other offices they’ve been at.

If the doctor spends more than 10 minutes with you, dont expect that every time.

How to judge your doctor’s communication skills:

- Does he smile?

- Is there open body posture? Does he lean forward?

- Does he make eye contact with you?

- Does he nod?

- Does he interrupt you - studies say that doctors interrupt patients 23 seconds into the interview.

- What’s his tone of voice like?

- Does he summarize what you discussed?

- Does he paraphrase your symptoms for you?

- Do you feel empowered?

Then we talked a bit about perception. Probably not enough though.

Listen in and see what you think..

 

Terrie

Permalink • Print • Comment

August 18, 2007

Perception - is it Really Reality?

Each of us has our own idea of what particular outcome we want no matter what the scenario. We don’t usually go into a situation blindly…we know what we would LIKE to happen. Whether that happens, is not the point.

So, I would venture to say that in addition to the expression "perception is reality" one has to add the word "expectation". Since you go into something with a certain expectation, that expectation is actually going to frame your perception.

What the heck am I talking about…well, consider this.

When you walk into the doctor’s office, do you expect people to look at you intensely? Do you expect them to be friendly when they ask "what can I do for you?" What do you expect? Are you putting your nervousness and fear in the way of what you expect? Do you "think" they will be mean and unfriendly? Are you judging from what others have told you about their "horrible" experiences with "The Doctor"? How have you come to form these expectations?

If you walk into the office expecting dull, unhappy, mean and unfriendly people, that’s probably what you’re going to get. And then, the vicious cycle has begun. You will assume that your perception of that encounter is a mirror of what’s to come. And that’s not necessarily the case. Maybe the person at the front desk is ill or has some major family problems. You don’t know what’s going on in his/her life that’s affecting the way he’s/she’s greeting you.

Don’t expect anything but the best. And if your perception of one thing isn’t the best, move right on to the next, knowing that that will be better.

One quick example to end this post for today (and I will post more later about this issue) -
If you go into the office thinking that since your appointment is at 10:00 you should be seen at 10:00, you’ll most likely be disappointed, right? Isn’t that what everyone talks about..hurry up and wait? So, why go in with the expectation that you’ll be seen at 10:00? Why set yourself up to be disappointed? Go in knowing that the doctor really does try to be on time but that maybe one or more other patients needed a bit extra or a return phone call and you’d like for the doctor to do the same for you - not say "oh, I’m sorry, I can’t do anything more than this because I have to be exactly on time." Go in prepared to wait and then you may be pleasantly surprised and if you’re not pleasantly surprised at least you’re not disappointed.

Take a look at your expectations….Until later….

Terrie

Permalink • Print • Comment

August 30, 2007

Satire - But, Oh So True!

This is very long but well worth the read (to me anyway). Although it’s about the mental health professionals, it could certainly be applied to any physician. Know anyone who fits this bill?

This article received a Thinking Blogger Award!

 This is my proposal for the DSM inclusion of a new section that outlines and categorizes the features of Mental Health Professional Personality Disorders or MHPPDs.

This proposal begins with a general definition of Mental Health Professional Personality Disorder that applies to each of the 4 specific MHPPDs. An MHPPD is an enduring pattern of inability to empathize with or understand the inner experience and behavior of certain patient populations that deviate markedly from the MHP’s own expectations, individual culture, life experience, values, and personal lifestyle preferences. MHPPD is pervasive, inflexible, prejudicial and has an onset upon reading educational psychiatric literature, engaging in disparaging prejudicial discussion with “more experienced” colleagues, may be triggered by reading a chart with which includes a previous undesirable diagnosis for a patient, is stable over time, and leads to further distress or impairment in the condition of the MHP’s patient. The Mental Health Professional Personality Disorders included in this proposal are listed below.

Mental Health Professional Paranoid Personality Disorder is a pattern of distrust and suspiciousness such that patients’ motives are interpreted as malevolent or manipulative.

Mental Health Professional Antisocial Personality Disorder is a pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of patients.

Mental Health Professional Narcissistic Personality Disorder is a pattern of grandiosity, need for the compliance of one’s patients, and a lack of empathy for the experience or suffering of those patients.

Mental Health Professional Coercive Personality Disorder is a pattern of dominant and aggressive authoritarian behavior related to an excessive need to be in control of patient treatment decisions.

Mental Health Professional Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified is a category provided for two situations: 1) the MHP’s personality pattern meets the general criteria for an MHPPD and the traits of several different MHPPDs are present, but the criteria for any specific MHPPD are not met; or 2) the MHP’s personality pattern meets the general criteria for an MHPPD that is not included in the Classification (e.g., mental health professional passive-aggressive personality disorder). It should be noted that MHPs frequently present with co-occurring personality disorders.

More on Satire - But, Oh So True!

Permalink • Print • Comment

July 5, 2007

Armed by the Internet….

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Judy Feder is grateful for having what she calls a rare rapport with her oncologist: the ability to discuss material she finds on the Internet that could alter her treatment course and quality of life.

Feder, 50, a public-relations professional in White Plains, N.Y., was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2001. She began approaching her doctor with articles, studies and ideas shortly thereafter.

Recently, she found a small body of evidence saying that one of her chemotherapy drugs, Xeloda, would be as effective if used for seven days followed by seven days off, as opposed to a 14-day stretch that precedes a break. The difference would spare her some noxious side effects, she said.

Her doctor was receptive. "She was going to go that route anyway but she said ‘I’m really glad you brought this in because I don’t have time to read everything,’" Feder said. Though her oncologist doesn’t agree with all her inquiries, Feder’s input — bolstered by online patient support groups — helps her take charge of her own care.  

"A couple of years of ago there was this default that doctors would say, ‘Oh, there’s so much bad information out there on the big nasty Internet.’ But I think people have gotten a lot more sophisticated" about finding reliable, credible resources, she said. "I don’t think doctors can use that excuse anymore, that if you got it on the Internet it’s not valid."

Feder’s experience underscores how the doctor-patient relationship is changing from one that pits a passive patient against a paternalistic doctor to more of an active collaboration. Some of the shift is driven by financial need. With more cost-sharing and high-deductible health plans emerging in employers’ benefits mix, patients are under pressure to take more responsibility for their care and its costs. 

"Consumers are forced to be more empowered, whether it’s higher copays for physicians or having to make decisions about things," said Mark Bard, president of Manhattan Research, a health-care market research firm in New York. "They need access to information on the front line, and increasingly physicians are being shown that information." 

Nearly two-thirds of physicians say the trend of patients coming in armed with online information is positive, up from 62% in 2004, according to a recent study from Manhattan Research. The referrals increasingly work both ways. Slightly more than half, or 52%, of 1,300 U.S. doctors said they recommend health-related Web sites to their patients.

Watching for pitfalls
Still, not all doctors welcome patients’ initiative and may see it as threatening to their expertise. Specialists such as neurologists, surgeons and cardiologists tend to be less enthusiastic than primary-care doctors and oncologists, Bard said.
What’s more, some doctors worry that consumers will try to self-diagnose and may be led astray by a false sense of security or unwarranted anxiety.
"There are cases where it can be detrimental and confusing to both patients and physicians," said Dr. Rick Kellerman, a family doctor in Wichita, Kan., and president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, whose members often point patients to its Web site, www.familydoctor.org.
Online research tends to benefit patients with certain conditions such as earaches, sore throats or even high blood pressure, he said. "We want patients in those situations to be well-educated."
But where the Web falls short is when a patient has a vague symptom or undifferentiated problem that could be caused by any number of ailments, Kellerman said, citing fatigue as an example. "Tiredness could be from thyroid problems, anemia, viruses like mononucleosis, diabetes. It could be a sleep disorder; it could be from depression."
Once patients jump to a conclusion, doctors can have a hard time steering the conversation back to a productive inquiry, he said. "It sometimes takes a long time to get people back on track."
While some patients will arrive with stacks of print-outs they want to discuss, most make judicious use of credible Internet material, which typically makes office visits run smoother, not longer, Bard said. "For more physicians than not, it’s adding some level of efficiency to their practice and generally improving physician-patient communication."
Doctors need to help patients determine what information is relevant to their individual situation and point out material that may be tainted by conflicts of interest, said Dr. Vicki Rackner, a surgeon and president of Medical Bridges, a Seattle outfit that consults with employers on employee health-care matters.
"There’s an awful lot of information that’s there to sell a product and sometimes it’s really hard to tell whose purposes are being served by having that information on the Internet," she said.
The first step is for patients to understand how much information they feel comfortable having and whether their style is compatible with their doctor’s, Rackner said. "If they are the kind of person who feels more empowered if they’ve done more research and they bring in a file case and the doctor says, ‘Oh, when did you go to medical school?’ 

That’s not a good match."

Where it gets less clear-cut is when patients can’t find answers from the medical establishment, she said. "There are people who go round and round and round and truly elude diagnosis or come to a conclusion that some doctors don’t believe in, like chronic fatigue syndrome."
Conditions that tend to strike women in particular can cause mysterious symptoms that leave patients in limbo for years before they get a solid diagnosis.
"The classic is lupus," Rackner said. "So what do you do? Do you suffer in silence, go to see another doctor? Most people go on the Internet, and the Internet is not set up as a diagnostic tool so they get frustrated. I have a lot of empathy for them, but what they need is a good doctor."
Spurring behavior change
Health information has been one of the Web’s most popular attractions for some time, and the offerings keep growing. Many existing sites are enhancing their tools and forming partnerships to better serve users and fend off competition from high-profile entrants such as Steve Case’s recently launched Revolution.com. See previous Vital Signs.
In the first three months of 2007, 55.3 million U.S. Internet users visited health-related sites, a 12% increase from the same period last year, according to comScore. WebMD Health led the category, followed by the National Institutes of Health site, NIH.gov, MSN Health and Yahoo Health.
Patients increasingly are going online not only to research information about their symptoms and conditions but to check a doctor’s ratings on sites such as HealthGrades.com, Best Doctors and Checkbook.org.
Physicians are starting to take ratings more seriously to improve their own practices, said Dr. Atul Gawande, a Harvard cancer surgeon and author of "Better: A Surgeon’s Notes on Performance."

"If we’re more transparent about our results, that gives people better opportunities to go to places where they know they get better results, but it also puts pressure on us to think harder about how we get those better results," Gawande said.

Doctors’ groups such as the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Heart Association and the American Society of Clinical Oncology provide patient-friendly Web sites that answer common questions, connect patients to other resources and remind them what to ask their doctors.
With the help of the Internet, patients are more aware of the portfolio of treatments for heart disease, said Dr. Clyde Yancy, medical director of the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute in Dallas.
Patients often resist making lifestyle changes and lowering their risks, he said, but those who use Web sites such as the American Heart Association’s Heart Profiler increase the chances they will comply with treatments.
"The next time you interface with that patient, they may have an understanding and may even have a sense of urgency," Yancy said. "That’s a wonderful day in the office because you can really make some headway."
Diane Blum, editor in chief of the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s Web site called People Living with Cancer, said reputable sites that suggest questions to ask the doctor or help patients locate clinical trials perform a vital service.
PLWC.org now details 100 cancer diagnoses, up from 25 when it launched five years ago. It has expanded offerings on coping with cancer and survivorship as more people are able to treat it as a chronic condition.
As more people go online for health information, the shift in expectations between doctors and patients is likely to be permanent, Blum said.

"Doctors are getting used to and valuing the more participatory and educated patient," she said. "With the baby boomer generation aging and moving into the prime years of cancer diagnosis, you’re going to see more of this interaction." 

Kristen Gerencher is a reporter for MarketWatch in San Francisco.

Permalink • Print • Comment

July 4, 2007

Using Business Intelligence (whatever that is) to increase satisfaction

I’ll tell you that the title of this turned me off but I forced myself to read it and then found it captivating…take a gander and see what you think. Thanks to Scott Wanless and the Business Intelligence Network. I’ve removed much of the business related info though. I think it’s interesting.

Increasing patient satisfaction is a critical goal for healthcare organizations of all types, especially in these times of increased competition, scrutiny and demand for services. Business intelligence based on satisfaction analytics can help you compete.

Our family doctor cements my loyalty as a patient every time I go to see him. He accomplishes this with one simple action combined with two sophisticated uses of patient intelligence. The simple action is to put notes into my care record that indicate what satisfies me. Currently, two of the notes in my record read: “Likes patient population statistics” and “Likes ideas that came from patients.” He has, for example, used both of these statements in a recent visit to diagnose and treat a sleep disorder I was experiencing. During our conversation, he asked one of the nurse practitioners to share statistics on the percentage of the clinic’s population who are experiencing the same type of sleep disorder, and then drill into the percentages for men vs. women and for men of my age group. This type of insight takes deep intelligence to be gathered, stored, processed and shared among the providers. This is business intelligence.

Taking this use of information one step further, our doctor then walked through a one-page sequence of events for my treatment. This included consult with a pulmonologist, an overnight study at a local hospital, education from a home health and medical equipment specialist, and finally follow-ups with both the pulmonologist and with him as my primary care physician. At each stage of this treatment, I was given information on what to expect and why, as well as homework I needed to do in preparation for the specific stage. He sealed the deal with me by telling me that this sequence of events originated with an idea from one patient, and has grown through refinements made in using it with a variety of patients over the past few years. This too is business intelligence.

What is Patient Satisfaction?

At first blush, patient satisfaction sounds like its cousin customer satisfaction. There are, however, significant differences between the two. Topping the list are the licensing and professional restrictions placed on healthcare providers, who must first consider what the patient needs before what the patient wants. In most businesses, trying to sell people what they need versus selling them what they want is an efficient way to go out of business because the competition will gladly reverse this order. I am free to buy just about anything I want in a grocery or hardware store without any regard to whether or not I need it. But I cannot just get an MRI scan or a prescription I saw advertised just because I want one.

In addition to these restrictions are the financial rules from payers, purchasers and the patients themselves. As a provider in a fee-for-service situation, another x-ray may be called for medically, and help the practice financially, but could very well be denied by the patient’s insurance plan. In a capitation situation, this additional x-ray comes out of the provider’s bottom line. Once again, need trumps want.

Patient satisfaction is the subject of numerous books, articles and studies. In Crossing the Quality Chasm, the Institute of Medicine identifies patient-centeredness as one of the six ingredients of quality healthcare. The book uses terms to describe this focus such as empathy, responsiveness to needs/preferences, involvement, respect, information, communication, education, emotional support, physical comfort, value, transparency and heeding expectations. Irwin Press (co-founder of Press-Ganey) discusses the importance of patient experiences and perceptions, and the need to go beyond technical quality to encompass service quality in his book Patient Satisfaction: Defining, Measuring and Improving the Experience of Care. Furthermore, the Gallup Organization has extended the concept of patient satisfaction to become patient engagement. In other words, involving the patient in their care and in the delivery of their care increases satisfaction, loyalty, cooperation and respect.

Common satisfaction measures were summed up in a recent study by DrScore and included:

  • Accessibility – both physical access and financial access to care.
  • Communication skills – of the doctors, nurses, PAs, NPs and others involved in direct patient care.
  • Personality and demeanor – of the same group.
  • Quality of medical-care processes – as provided directly to the patient.
  • Care continuity – regarding the handoffs made provider-to-provider, as well as across time.
  • Quality of healthcare facilities – in terms of having the appropriate equipment, supplies and peripheral resources available.
  • Efficiency of office staff – in handling scheduling, billing, etc.

As you can see from these lists, the focus of patient satisfaction relies on providers going beyond the mechanical delivery of medical care to the delivery of a true health service.

Driving Forces for Increasing Patient Satisfaction
The list of benefits of paying attention to patient satisfaction is long and extends to virtually every corner of the healthcare organization whether hospital, physician practice, home health, long-term care and so forth. This makes sense, since the range of factors making up satisfaction is quite wide.

With greater patient satisfaction comes:

Clinical Benefits

  • Greater patient trust and acceptance with treatment plans.
  • Increasing buy-in for treatment plans more quickly, making best use of scarce physician time.
  • Increasing trust, which allows physician to discover more factors that may affect the care needs of the patient.
  • Enhancing patient involvement in their own care through preventative measures, corrective measures and so forth.

Operational Benefits

  • Driving efficiency into the organization by focusing on what works well with patients, and eliminating what does not work well.
  • Cross-over trust is enhanced. For instance, a good experience in scheduling appointments can cross over into a better experience with the care provider. In addition, a good experience with the patient’s PCP can cross over into a more positive experience with specialists that the PCP has referred.
  • Increased internal support for other quality improvement efforts, such as timeliness improvement, care process improvement, etc.

References:
White B. Measuring Patient Satisfaction: How to Do It and Why to Bother. Family Practice Management; January 1999, Vol. 6, No. 1, pages 40-4.

Permalink • Print • Comment

July 1, 2007

Here’s an interesting article that hinges around communication differences between men and women and the diagnosis of  complex pain conditions.

More Difficult For Doctors To Diagnose Complex Sources Of Pain In Women Than In Men

It is more difficult for doctors to diagnose complex sources of pain in women than in men and the reasons for this are rooted in language use. This finding, which is of major importance for both doctors and patients, is revealed by a now completed project by the FWF Austrian Science Fund. The results of this research into how the two genders typically describe pain are to be presented at the 2nd International Congress of Gender Medicine on 2nd and 3rd June in Vienna.

For quite some time, we have all known that men are from Mars and women from Venus, but scientific research has now proven that, when it comes to describing complex pain, men and women are worlds apart. This finding comes from studies that investigated patients suffering from complex headaches. While female patients give doctors brief and vague illustrations of their complaints, men describe their pain in an extremely concrete manner. This means that male patients are at an advantage when it comes to treatment as an accurate analysis of pain is essential for both diagnosis and therapy. 

{Terrie’s note - I do not necessarily agree with the statement that women give brief and vague illustrations of their complaints - or if they do, perhaps it’s for multiple, complex reasons - perhaps it’s perceptions of how the doctor is dealing with them or many other things…this statement is not well qualified to me and it gives women a bad "name" again}

LACK OF COMMUNICATION

A team headed by Prof. Florian Menz of the Department of Linguistics at the University of Vienna established that these different approaches to describing pain are caused by language barriers. Prof. Menz believes that "Women are rather vague and less detailed when portraying their pain, often focusing on the day-to-day situations in which the pain occurs. However, this does not constitute a description of pain in medical terms, as doctors develop a largely symptom-oriented language over the course of their careers. Men, on the other hand, describe their pain in very concrete terms focusing on their symptoms, which is very compatible with medical diagnostics and makes it easier for doctor and patient to understand one another."

{Terrie’s note - so maybe doctors need to be aware of this and change their approach to women?}

By investigating other patients suffering from chronic pain, the study showed that doctor-patient communication is also inadequate on other levels and leads to misunderstandings. While doctors are again primarily concerned with analysing pain when they speak to patients, the patients themselves ¬ who have lived with their pain for a number of years ¬ are more focused on treatment options for example. In such a scenario, doctor-patient discussions often fall short of patient expectations, as they are keen to be involved in the decision-making process.

Permalink • Print • Comment

June 29, 2007

Getting What You Need From The Health Care System

 This is about heart disease from About.com but the info is still pertinent

Getting What You Need From the Health Care System

There’s nothing more frustrating, or more dangerous, than having to solve your own medical problems. No matter how many hours you spend searching the Internet, listening to the accumulated wisdom of your Great Aunt Hilda, or engaging in games of Twenty Questions with taciturn medical personnel, you can never be sure you’ve got the right answer. 

It’s not supposed to be like that. When you’re sick and need help, you’re supposed to be able to rely on a doctor - a doctor who is knowledgeable, who really cares what happens to you, and who will leave no stone unturned in seeing that you get exactly what you need.  Unfortunately, having such a "model" doctor is becoming rare. Patients are on their own much more often, and to a much greater extent, than they used to be - and it’s getting worse all the time.  

If you’ve read Part 1 of this series, you’re acquainted with our contention that patients are feeling abandoned by the health care system because they really have been abandoned; and that (because widespread covert rationing is systematically destroying the doctor-patient relationship,) the abandonment of patients is happening by design rather than by chance. But even if you don’t buy DrRich’s explanation of the problem, the problem still remains. When you’re sick and find yourself engaged in a hostile health care system, you need somebody in your corner who knows what she’s doing, and who cares about you.  And that somebody is supposed to be your doctor.

Choosing the right doctor for yourself, and nurturing a good relationship with him, is probably the most critical step you can take in becoming an effective patient. With the right doctor at your side, the path to good health care becomes clear and wide. Without that doctor, you’re lost and alone in the enchanted forest.  Accordingly, this article discusses two aspects of dealing with your doctor: Choosing the Right Doctor, and The Care and Feeding of your Doctor-Patient Relationship.

Rule # 1. We ought to begin with the first rule of choosing a doctor, to wit: You hired him; you can fire him.

Choosing a doctor is different than, say, choosing a car. When you buy a new car, you can shop around to your heart’s content, but once you plunk down your money and bring that baby home, you’re pretty much stuck with it. If it’s not everything you hoped it would be, you can’t just get rid of it - why, it lost 50% of its original value the minute you drove it off the lot. Besides, it’s not life and death, it’s just a car. So if your new car turns out to be a disappointment, you’ll usually shrug your shoulders and resolve to live with it for a few years, at least until you can justify buying another one. 

It’s different with doctors. For one thing, it’s harder to shop around before you make your move. For another, starting with a new doctor doesn’t require an up-front investment of tens of thousands of dollars. Early on, all you’ve invested is some time and inconvenience. And finally, choosing the right doctor potentially is a matter of life and death.

Many patients have the same attitude when they’re dissatisfied with their doctors that they would have if they were dissatisfied with a car - "Oh, well, guess I’ll just have to live with it." This is the wrong attitude, since, indeed, in this case you may not live with it. Doctors are serious business.  Choosing a doctor is an important decision, but it’s not an irreversible one. It’s not uncommon for discerning patients to run through two or three doctors before finding the right match. And there’s nothing wrong with doing it that way. So if you’ve tried a new doctor and you’re not satisfied with him, get another one. Remember: You hired him; you can fire him.

The most important factor in choosing a doctor: Communication.  If you can’t communicate well with your doctor, you’re in trouble. This is the person, after all, who will need to understand your wishes and values regarding your health care. She is the one who will need to explain to you, so that you can understand it, the nature of your medical problems - the causes, the testing that may be needed, the potential treatments, the pros and cons of the various therapeutic options, and why she’s recommending one option over the others. She’s also the one who has to convince your insurance carrier that the course of action you and she have decided upon is the right one, that it’s medically necessary, and that they - the insurance carrier - ought to pay for it. Communication has always been important in medicine. Now it’s vital.

Is your doctor really listening to what you are saying? Does he show he understands your concerns by responding meaningfully to them? When he explains medical issues to you, does he make them understandable? Does he have more than one way of explaining a difficult concept? Is he patient with you, waiting for you to grasp what he’s saying, or does he try to embarrass you into saying you understand, with shakes of his head or rolling of his eyes? Do you like him, and more importantly, does he seem to like you? (This may become very important when it’s time for him to go to bat for you.) 

The inability to communicate effectively with your doctor is sufficient reason to move on to someone else. Without communication, you’ve got nothing.

The second most important factor: Does your doctor know what she’s doing?

Sometimes its hard to know for sure how knowledgeable your doctor is. But at a minimum you should check to see if your doctor is board-certified in her specialty.  At least two sources can help. The Directory of Physicians in the United States and the Official American Board of Medical Specialties Directory of Board Certified Medical Specialists list doctors who are board-certified. These books are available in most public libraries, and your doctor should appear in them.

Does your doctor seem smart to you? When you ask a question about one of you health problems, are the answers quick, logical, and cogent? Do the answers jibe with what you know to be true? Are her answers given confidently, or is she dissembling? Keep in mind that it’s often fine for a doctor to answer, "I don’t know," as long as she promises to find out the answer, and then follows through on that promise.

For specialists you will be seeing only once or twice, or who you are going to for some complex or esoteric medical procedure, their experience, knowledge and ability are often much more important than how well they communicate. If I’m having a heart valve surgery, I care much less about how warm and fuzzy the surgeon makes me feel during the pre-op interview, and much more about how many similar procedures she’s performed, and what have been her surgical results.

The third most important factor:  Is your doctor respected by his peers?

Doctors watch each other perform in the trenches, and in general, are pretty good at sizing each other up. If you can get a recommendation on a doctor from another doctor you know you can trust, that’s likely to be a good starting point.  If you know some doctors, ask them what they think. Would they send their own patients to your doctor? Or, better yet, do they send their own family members to him? Do they use him as their own doctor?  And, if your doctor is invited to participate in the training of medical students or medical residents at the local university, that’s a reasonably good sign that he’s held in high regard by his peers.

Other factors to consider. 

  • Where is your prospective doctor located? Is her office convenient to you?
  • Which hospitals does she have admitting privileges to? Are these hospitals convenient to you, and do the specialists there (since the specialists in those hospitals are the ones she will be referring you to) have a good reputation?
  • What are her practice arrangements? Who covers for her when she is away?
  • Is her age, gender or race important to you?
  • What is her office staff like? Are they reasonably competent, friendly, and helpful, or is their main job to keep you out?
  • What are her office hours and office policies?
  • What insurance plans does she participate in? This may be especially important if you are likely to be changing jobs (and thus changing insurance carriers.)

Where to look.

Start with your family and friends - people whose opinions you trust. Find out who their doctors are, and whether they are happy with them. Find out why they like them.  Also, talk to medical specialists, and especially to nurses and (if you know any), physicians’ assistants.  See which doctors they respect and admire, and why.

Another place you might consider looking is www.bestdoctors.com.  This is a listing of American physicians chosen through a survey of other American physicians.  For a doctor to make the list, a large number of physicians have to assert that they would want that doctor to take care of them or their family members if they were sick. Best Doctors is a business, however, and currently requires a $35 subscription fee.  A problem with Best Doctors is that it is sometimes weighted toward academic physicians, and there are potential drawbacks to academics - doctors often sing the praises of academics not because they are especially good doctors, but because they have published a lot, or are in positions of power. Some of the most famous university doctors are not especially good clinicians. The bottom line is that while you may find Best Doctors useful, it should by no means become your chief searching tool.  The large majority of excellent doctors in the U.S. are not listed there at all. If you strictly limit your search in this way you may be cheating yourself.

Once you have made your list of doctors, check for them in the Directory of Physicians in the United States or the Official American Board of Medical Specialties Directory of Board Certified Medical Specialists in your public library to make sure they are board certified.  Finally, call the office of one or two of the doctors still remaining on your list. See what you have to do to get an appointment.  See whether the office personnel seem friendly and efficient, or whether they’re obstreperous and obstructive.  Remember that you may need to deal with these people fairly often, and that before you ever get in to see the doctor, you’ve got to get past them. And remember that the doctor’s front office is a reflection of his own personality.  If his receptionists and nurses are difficult to deal with, you’ve got to assume that the doctor likes it that way. 

 The remaining step is to pick one of the "finalists" on your list, and make yourself an appointment.  If after meeting with the doctor you decide this isn’t going to work out, remember Rule # 1.

If you’ve read Part 1 of this series, you know that the traditional doctor-patient relationship is in deep trouble.  The problem, of course, is that the health care system simply can’t afford the traditional doctor-patient relationship anymore. There’s no way that HMOs, hospitals, insurance carriers, or federal regulators can allow doctors to continue directing the spending of health care dollars as if the only important consideration is the welfare their patients. In thousands of ways doctors are being coerced into giving the needs of each of these other parties a higher priority than the needs of their patients. So in becoming an effective patient, you’ve got to take the weakened state of the doctor-patient relationship into account.

The effective patient’s strategy 

Simply assuming that your doctor is always going to be acting in your best interests - no matter how good a doctor he is, or how ethical - is a big mistake.  The effective patient understands this, but she understands something else, too. She understands that her doctor (if she’s chosen her doctor wisely) deeply wants to honor the traditional doctor-patient relationship, since honoring that relationship is his first duty as a professional. She understands that, despite all the coercive pressure to the contrary, her doctor will occasionally go up against an HMO for the benefit of a patient. He needs to do this as a matter of professional pride - just to be able to live with himself. (The HMOs understand this, too. Letting the doctors win one now and then - only, of course, after putting up a stiff resistance - costs them some money, but in the long run keeps the doctors mollified. It keeps the doctors working, and it keeps them quiet. It’s just one of the costs of doing business.) The effective patient also understands that, as much as he may want to, her doctor cannot go to the wall for every patient, or for every issue that comes up for a given patient. The process would be too grindingly difficult, and fatal to his career. She knows that her doctor must choose his battles carefully.

The effective patient understands all this, and nurtures her relationship with her doctor accordingly. She tailors the relationship in such a way that, when the chips are down, she is likely to be one of those her doctor will go to the wall for.  To be such an effective patient, consider following these three general strategies:

Strategy 1 - Be empathetic.  Show that you understand the constraints under which your doctor is laboring, and adjust your expectations accordingly. Don’t be too demanding, especially regarding the small stuff. Show that you respect your doctor’s skills, and that having his skills working for you is worth a few minor inconveniences. After all, you make clear, you know how hard it is to be a good doctor these days, and you’re thankful he’s there for you despite everything. 

Strategy 2 - Align your interests with those of your doctor. Remember: you and your doctor are in this together. He feels your pain, and you feel his. You both want the same things. You both want the patient (you) to get good health care; and you both want the doctor’s practice - and professional integrity - to thrive. So while you fully expect to get the care you need from your doctor, you will help him to deliver that care as efficiently and as cheaply as posible.

You will not bother him needlessly, or thoughtlessly. You will make the most efficient use of your time with him. You will learn how his office operates, and cooperate with his office staff in minimizing interruptions and special requests. (For instance, inquire as to the best time to call the office with questions, or to speak with the doctor.) The main idea is: you are interested in making the doctor’s job as easy for him as possible, while still having your own vital needs served. 

Strategy 3 - Become engaged in your own good health. Nothing makes doctors crazier than patients who completely neglect their own health, then expect their doctors to pull out all the stops for them when they get into medical difficulties. The fact is, your doctor simply cannot afford to vigorously advocate for every problem for every patient. This being the case, which patient is your doctor more likely to fight for when they get sick - the obese smoker who has made no visible effort to take care of himself, or the diabetic who has carefully tried to follow her difficult diet and drug regimens?  

Maybe it isn’t fair, but it’s nonetheless true. If a doctor is considering stepping out of line and jeopardizing his own security to fight for his patient’s best outcome, you can be sure he’s more likely to reserve that action for a patient who’s fighting right at his side for the very same thing. 

You greatly increase the likelihood that your doctor will go to the wall for you if you are fully engaged in maintaining your own good health. You need to stop smoking, lose weight, exercise, take an interest in disease prevention, and during your visits to your doctor, demonstrate how involved you are with your own health care. Make yourself into the kind of patient that doctors find it rewarding and fulfilling to fight for.

Summary

By understanding how and why the doctor-patient relationship is under fierce attack, you can "manage" your own doctor-patient relationship to make yourself a more effective patient. 
Any doctor worth her salt will respond favorably to patients who seem to understand the duress she faces each day in the practice of medicine, who try to help her keep her head above water while she provides health care, and who take an active role in maintaining their own health. Patients like that are worth their weight in gold, and doctors try hard to provide them with the best health care they can possibly manage.

Permalink • Print • Comment

June 26, 2007

The Patient-Physician Encounter

 What a great article from About.com - even though it’s primarily about arthritis, the concepts are exactly the same for every patient-physician encounter. Read about it.

The Patient-Physician Encounter

From Carol & Richard Eustice 

The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease ~ William Osler (Canadian Physician, 1849-1919) 

The Patient-Physician Encounter 

What do patients want from a medical encounter with a physician?

In the thoughts of one physician (Delbanco,1992)

  • Patients want to be able to trust the competence and efficacy of their caregivers.
  • Patients want to be able to negotiate the health care system effectively and to be treated with dignity and respect.
  • Patients want to understand how their sickness or treatment will affect their lives, and they often fear that their doctors are not telling them everything they want to know.
  • Patients want to discuss the effect their illness will have on their family, friends, and finances.
  • Patients worry about the future.
  • Patients worry about and want to learn how to care for themselves away from the clinical setting.
  • Patients want physicians to focus on their: 
                      pain
                      physical discomfort
                      functional disabilities  

The Relationship Between Patient And Physician 

The relationship between patient and physician has been analyzed since the early 1900’s. Prior to when medicine was more science than art, physicians worked to refine their bedside manner, as cures were often impossible and treatment had limited effect.

In the middle of the century when science and technology emerged, interpersonal aspects of health care were overshadowed. There is currently a renewed interest in medicine as a social process. A physician can do as much harm to a patient with the slip of a word as with the slip of a knife. 

Instrumental And Expressive Components 

The patient-physician encounter crosses two dimensions:

  • The "instrumental" component involves the competence of the physician in performing the technical aspects of care such as:

    • expressive
    • performing diagnostic tests
    • physical examinations
    • prescribing treatments
  • The "expressive" component reflects the art of medicine, including the affective portion of the interaction such as warmth and empathy, and how the physician approaches the patient.

  • 3 Common Patient-Physician Relationship Models

     #1) The Activity-Passivity Model - Not The Best Model For Chronic Arthritis

    It is the opinion of some people that the differential in power between the patient and physician is necessary to the steady course of medical care. The patient seeks information and technical assistance, and the physician formulates decisions which the patient must accept. Though this seems appropriate in medical emergencies, this model, known as the activity-passivity model, has lost popularity in the treatment of chronic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus. In this model the physician actively treats the patient, but the patient is passive and has no control.

    #2) The Guidance-Cooperation Model - The Most Prevelant Model

    The guidance-cooperation model is the most prevalent in current medical practice. In this model, the physician recommends a treatment and the patient cooperates. This coincides with the "doctor knows best" theory whereby the doctor is supportive and non-authoritarian, yet is responsible for choosing the appropriate treatment. The patient, having lesser power, is expected to follow the recommendations of the physician.

    Part 2 of 2 - The Patient-Doctor Relationship Can Impact Success of Treatment

    3 Common Patient-Physician Relationship Models - 

    #3) The Mutual Participation Model - Shared Responsibility

    In the third model, the mutual participation model, the physician and patient share responsibility for making decisions and planning the course of treatment. The patient and physician are respectful of each others expectations and values.

    Some have argued that this is the most appropriate model for chronic illnesses such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus, where patients are responsible for implementing their treatment and determining its efficacy. The changes in the course of chronic rheumatic conditions require a physician and patient to have open communication so as to determine the success of a treatment plan. 

    What Is The Optimal Patient-Physician Relationship Model For Chronic Arthritis? 

    Some rheumatologists feel that the optimal patient-physician relationship model is somewhere between guidance-cooperation and mutual participation.

    In reality, the nature of the patient-physician relationship likely changes over time. Early on, at the time of diagnosis, education and guidance is useful in learning to manage the disease. Once treatment plans are established the patient moves towards the mutual-participation model as they: 

  • monitor their symptoms
  • report difficulties
  • work with the physician to modify their treatment plan  

    The Efficacy Of Treatment 

    Arthritis is not a single disease. There are over 100 types of arthritis and related conditions. The effectiveness of treatment is largely dependent on the patient carrying out the directions of the physician. Treatment options for arthritis may involve: 

    Non-adherence to the physicians treatment plan does imply a negative outcome. In this regard, non-adherence suggests a complete failure to follow a prescribed treatment. The assumption here is that: 

  • the treatment is appropriate and effective
  • there is an association between adherence and improved health
  • the patient is able to carry out the treatment plan  
  • What Are The Effects Of An Effective Patient-Physician Relationship?

    What are the effects of an effective patient-physician relationship? When the PATIENT-PHYSICIAN RELATIONSHIP includes:

  • competence
  • communication
  • an effective style
  • These factors can provide for PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH CARE which leads to better ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT.

  • When better ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT combines with PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH CARE, this often promotes IMPROVED HEALTH with a BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE.

    BOTTOMLINE: The adherence to a treatment plan by a patient and the success of the treatment can be greatly impacted by the patient-physician relationship. 

  • Source: Understanding Rheumatoid Arthritis by Stanton Newman, Ray Fitzpatrick, Tracey A. Revenson, Suzanne Skevington, and Gareth Williams
  • Permalink • Print • Comment

    Insurance Company looks at ways to improve communication

     

    Physician-patient relationships Business Editors/Medical Editors BOSTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–May 17, 2007–As part of its ongoing commitment to patient safety, ProMutual Group, a leading provider of medical liability insurance in the Northeast, is pleased to announce that on behalf of its insured physicians, it has negotiated a discount on annual subscriptions to EmmiPrep(TM), an innovative, web-based, patient education and risk management tool. The reduced cost of Emmi will be effective immediately for all policyholders that purchase an annual subscription.

    Developed by Emmi Solutions, LLC, the innovative Emmi system is designed to help healthcare providers improve the quality and reduce the costs of healthcare. At the heart of the Emmi system are engaging, interactive programs that help patients and their families understand what to expect before, during and after a medical procedure. The Emmi program’s interactive nature allows patients to ask specific and confidential questions of their physician and alerts physicians to specific concerns the patient may have. This important attribute further enhances communication and strengthens the physician-patient relationship. The program also provides detailed documentation of each patient interaction with the program and provides physicians with a powerful risk management tool to ensure patients understand their role in ongoing care before and after a procedure. 

    We are constantly looking for new and innovative ways to promote patient safety," said Maureen Mondor, vice president of risk management for ProMutual Group. "Emmi provides an excellent means of educating patients, improving the informed consent process and mitigating risk. We think Emmi will be an ideal complement to ProMutual Group’s ongoing efforts to provide superior risk management services to our insureds so they can better meet the needs of patients and the challenges of healthcare practice today."

    Studies indicate that patients who fully understand what to expect from medical procedures are more satisfied with the outcomes and less likely to file medical malpractice claims. Not surprisingly, a 2006 survey conducted by Emmi Solutions found that of the 18,000 patients who had viewed an Emmi program, 96 percent developed a better understanding of their procedure. Additionally, 79 percent of patients found that the program provided new and important information and 85 percent reported that the program increased their confidence in their doctor and comfort level with the procedure.

    "I want to do everything I can to increase patient safety and reduce risk in procedures that I perform," said Dr. Murray Goodman, an orthopedic surgeon in Salem, Mass. "A large part of that is educating patients and helping to bring their expectations in line with reality. I always have an informed consent conversation with my patients, but using Emmi helps many of my patients more fully understand the proposed procedure, the reason behind it, and its risks and benefits."

    By utilizing Emmi in their practices, ProMutual Group policyholders will be able to build relationships with patients, further improve patient satisfaction and increase patient safety.

    "We are pleased to be collaborating with ProMutual Group in introducing Emmi to the physicians they insure," said Jordan Dolin, vice chairman of Emmi Solutions, LLC. "Emmi is a unique, innovative system that has been adopted by some of the most progressive healthcare providers in the country. We think it’s a great fit for ProMutual Group and its insureds to enhance the healthcare experience for everyone involved."

    For more information about the Emmi Solutions program, to schedule an interview with a ProMutual Group representative or speak with a physician currently utilizing the system, please contact Nina Akerley at ProMutual Group via telephone number (617) 946-8665 or by email at nakerley@promutualgroup.com.

    About ProMutual Group

    ProMutual Group is the largest provider of medical malpractice liability insurance in New England, insuring more than 18,000 physicians, surgeons, and dentists as well as a large number of hospitals, health centers and clinics. It is one of the top 10 medical liability insurance providers in the country based on direct written premium. ProMutual Group has more than $2 billion in admitted assets, over $500 million in policyholder surplus, and nearly $340 million in direct written premium. ProMutual Group has a Best’s Rating of A- (Excellent), and is a leader in providing risk management and claim services.

    Based in Massachusetts, ProMutual Group member companies also operate in Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Vermont. ProMutual Group distributes its products through independent agents. For more information, visit ProMutual Group’s web site at www.promutualgroup.com.

    About Emmi Solutions

    Emmi Solutions, LLC is the producer of the Emmi healthcare communication system, helping health organizations connect more intimately and effectively with patients and their families. In a field where trust and good communication is critical to quality and safety, Emmi is highly regarded as a one-of-a-kind intervention that clarifies complex information using a conversational voice to engage patients and affect behavioral change.

    Created in 2002 by a surgeon and a computer game designer, Emmi facilitates physician-patient communication by providing multimedia programs to help patients understand what to expect. Whether it’s preparing for a procedure, living successfully with a medical device, or helping people manage a chronic disease, every detail of the Emmi system is designed with a single goal in mind: to improve quality by helping patients, their families and caregivers take an active role in their care. Better-informed patients who are engaged in their care drive benefits that cascade across all healthcare organizations and interests.

    Permalink • Print • Comment

    June 23, 2007

    Managing Stress in a Workplace Full of Risks

    Managing Stress in a Workplace Full of Risks

    Pharmacy work can be highly stressful, and pharmacists who are under extreme stress are at risk for more errors, said Henry Cobb, PhD, MD, BS, CDM, Clinical Associate Professor, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia.[11] Pharmacists need to identify their own personal stress triggers and anticipate their responses to stress. He presented 5 questions that could be used for such self-analysis:

    • How do you know whether stress is a problem for you?
    • What is causing most of your stress?
    • Is your supervisor aware of the problem?
    • How do you deal with stress?
    • What can you do to reduce the impact of stress?

    Cobb described 3 ways that most workers deal with stress on the job. The active-cognitive person draws on past experience, taking one thing at a time. He or she considers several alternatives, looking for the positive side, and is able to step back and be objective. The active-behavioral person finds out more about the situation and takes positive action. He or she may talk with a friend or spouse, exercise more, or talk with a professional in order to find a solution. The person who practices avoidance keeps feelings to himself or herself, prepares for the worst, takes out frustrations on others, and eats or smokes more to reduce tension.

    Identifying the phases of stress can be helpful. Phase 1, or the warning phase, includes vague anxiety, depression, and apathy. Phase 2, or mild stress, includes sleep disturbances, muscle aches, and irritability. Entrenched stress, or phase 3, includes alcohol abuse, depression, ulcers, withdrawal, and marital discord. Phase 4, or severe stress, includes asthma, heart problems, severe depression, violence (or suicide), paranoia, and uncontrolled anger. It is important to note that professional help is needed for phases 3 and 4.

    To reduce stress on the job, Cobb presented this list of quick strategies:

    1. Discontinue caffeine;
    2. Engage in regular exercise (30 minutes 3 times weekly);
    3. Practice relaxation-breathing exercises (20 minutes 2 times weekly);
    4. Get adequate sleep (try going to bed 30 minutes earlier than usual);
    5. Nurture your leisure time, engage in hobbies;
    6. Set realistic expectations and avoid perfection;
    7. Reframe your outlook to be optimistic, not pessimistic;
    8. Eat right;
    9. Maintain a sense of humor;
    10. Talk and vent;
    11. Write down your thoughts;
    12. Avoid unhealthy habits (such as alcohol);
    13. Set limits (learn to say "no"); and
    14. Get help from a professional.

    In some cases, however, a person who is in a job that does not match his or her personality and preferences may need to switch to another role or job, Cobb added. That may be a much better stress-reduction technique than any other.

    Permalink • Print • Comment
    Made with WordPress and an easy to use WordPress theme • Boxed skin by Denis de Bernardy